← Back to arXiv
arXivCombinatoricsarXiv:2607.12090

Induced-Minor-Closed Classes have Linear, Square-Root, or Sub-Polynomial Tree-Independence

The paper studies a structural property of graphs called "tree-independence number," which measures how complex a graph is in a specific sense. To understand it, think of a tree decomposition as a way of breaking a graph into overlapping clusters arranged in a tree-like hierarchy. The tree-independence number captures how large an independent set (a collection of vertices with no edges between them) you can find within any single cluster of the best such decomposition. Graphs with small tree-independence number are easier to work with algorithmically, because many hard problems become tractable when this number is small.

The central result is a trichotomy: for graphs that avoid two particular "induced minor" patterns, called the complete bipartite graph and the wall graph, the tree-independence number grows much more slowly than the size of the graph itself, specifically slower than any polynomial. An induced minor is a graph you can obtain by deleting vertices and contracting edges, while preserving the induced structure. Avoiding these two patterns is a natural and broad condition that captures many well-studied graph families. The authors show that for such graphs, the tree-independence number is at most sub-polynomial in the number of vertices, which in turn allows many computational problems to be solved in sub-exponential time on these graph classes.

More broadly, the paper establishes a complete classification of graph classes defined by forbidden induced minors into three tiers: those with sub-polynomial tree-independence (the easiest), those where the tree-independence grows like the square root of the number of vertices (intermediate), and those where it grows linearly (the hardest). This classification mirrors similar trichotomies known for related graph width parameters and settles a significant open question in structural graph theory. It also partially resolves a conjecture that the relevant graph classes should have even tighter, poly-logarithmic bounds, showing at minimum that the growth is sub-polynomial even if the sharper bound remains open.

Read original →