Researchers studying numerical integration and random sampling care deeply about "discrepancy," which measures how uniformly a set of points covers a space. Low discrepancy means the points are spread out well, avoiding both clumps and gaps. One classical approach is to divide space into a regular grid and then randomly jitter or nudge each grid point by a small random amount drawn from some probability distribution. This paper studies how the choice of that distribution affects the quality of the resulting point set.
The central finding is that almost any fixed probability distribution you use for the jittering behaves the same way as pure random sampling (Monte Carlo) when you look at discrepancy. The only exceptions are distributions that put all their mass on a single point, meaning no randomness at all. In other words, the specific shape of your jitter distribution does not matter much in the long run: you get roughly the same discrepancy guarantees as if you had just placed points completely at random.
However, the situation changes when the jitter distribution is allowed to shrink as the grid gets finer, concentrating the perturbation within a small neighborhood of each grid point. In that regime, the paper proves that the best possible discrepancy is achieved when the support of the distribution has diameter no larger than roughly one over the grid spacing. The authors also show this bound cannot be improved, making it tight. The practical takeaway is that small, localized jitter around each grid point is the right strategy if you want the best discrepancy from this family of methods.