← Back to arXiv
arXivCombinatoricsarXiv:2608.07607

A congruence obstruction to Roman's bound for Zarankiewicz numbers

The paper studies a classical combinatorics problem: how many ones can you fit in a grid of zeros and ones without ever having a certain-sized rectangular block that is entirely ones? The answer to this question, called a Zarankiewicz number, has been bounded above since 1975 by an inequality due to Roman. However, it has long been suspected that Roman's bound is often too loose, meaning the true answer can be noticeably smaller than what Roman's formula predicts. This paper gives a precise explanation of when and why that gap occurs.

The core finding is a "congruence obstruction," meaning that simple divisibility constraints, specifically whether certain counts are divisible by particular integers, can force the actual maximum to fall strictly below Roman's bound. The authors identify two distinct scenarios where this happens. In one scenario, the obstruction appears only for odd values of the block-size parameter and only for specific spacing patterns of grid sizes. In the other, more broadly applicable scenario, the gap opens up across a wide range of grid sizes once the grid is large enough. The paper also provides cases where the exact answer can be pinned down precisely, including one family where a clean formula holds whenever a certain combinatorial design (a structured arrangement guaranteeing uniform coverage) exists.

The paper then connects these findings to a technique called linear programming, which is a standard way of getting upper bounds in combinatorics by solving an optimization problem over continuous variables. The authors show that the most natural linear programming relaxation for this problem automatically collapses to the same counting bound that was already known, meaning it cannot capture the congruence obstruction at all. A more refined linear program due to recent work by Davies, Gill, and Horsley does better in some cases, and the paper carefully maps out where that improvement occurs and where even that stronger approach still agrees with Roman's bound, giving a clearer picture of the overall landscape of this decades-old problem.

Read original →