← Back to arXiv
arXivLogicarXiv:2608.17107

When is double negation Scott continuous?

The paper investigates a technical question in topology and order theory: when does a particular operation called "double negation" behave nicely with respect to a notion of continuity called Scott continuity? To understand this roughly, think of a topological space as a collection of points with a structure describing which subsets are "open." The open sets form an algebraic structure called a frame, and on any frame there is a natural operation called the double negation nucleus, which sends each open set to a kind of "dense" approximation of it. Scott continuity is a way of saying that an operation respects certain limits of increasing sequences, and it is a standard compatibility condition in domain theory and theoretical computer science.

The main result is that for a well-behaved class of spaces (those that are sober and T1, meaning they satisfy two standard separation conditions), the double negation operation is Scott continuous if and only if the space is discrete, meaning every subset is open. As a consequence, if the space is also compact, Scott continuity of double negation forces the space to be finite. The authors carefully show that dropping either the sober or the T1 assumption can break this conclusion, so both conditions are genuinely necessary. They also extend the result beyond double negation to a broader family of operations called boolean nuclei, showing the same dichotomy holds there.

Finally, the paper provides a characterization that goes in a different direction: instead of asking when one specific operation is Scott continuous, it asks what it means for all Scott continuous nuclei on a frame to form a closed collection. The answer turns out to be exactly that the underlying space is sober and T1. This gives a clean, purely algebraic way to detect a combination of separation properties from the structure of the frame alone, without directly referring to the points of the space. Overall the work clarifies the interplay between topological separation axioms and order-theoretic continuity in pointfree topology.

Read original →