The Grassmannian is a geometric space that organizes all the ways to choose a certain number of directions in a higher-dimensional space. It can be broken into smaller pieces called positroid varieties, each labeled by a type of generalized permutation. These pieces have become important in mathematics and physics alike. The central question of this work is simple to state: which of these pieces are geometrically smooth, and which have singular points, meaning places where the space crinkles or self-intersects in ways that make calculus break down? The author shows that to answer this, you only need to check a special finite collection of points called torus-fixed points, which dramatically simplifies the problem.
To detect and measure singularities at those special points, the author uses a tool from algebraic topology called equivariant cohomology, which assigns a number called the multiplicity to each point. A multiplicity of one means the space is smooth there; anything larger signals a singularity. Two methods are provided for computing these multiplicities: a visual, diagram-based approach using objects called affine pipe dreams, and a computational approach backed by publicly available code. The author also worked out tables listing multiplicities for all relevant cases up through a certain size parameter, and identified a clean organizing structure called deletion and contraction that links nearby cases together.
The second part of the thesis connects this geometry to theoretical physics, specifically to a highly symmetric quantum field theory called planar N=4 super Yang-Mills. Physicists use this theory as a laboratory for understanding particle scattering amplitudes, and the relevant calculations turn out to involve integrals over exactly these positroid varieties. The author explains a recursive technique called BCFW recursion for building up complicated scattering amplitudes from simpler pieces, shows how those pieces can be represented on pipe dream diagrams, and investigates whether the geometric singularities found in the first part have any physical meaning for the amplitudes. The answer is exploratory but suggestive, opening a potential bridge between the pure geometry of singularities and observable quantities in physics.