The paper works in the mathematical field of D-module theory, which studies systems of partial differential equations on complex spaces using algebraic tools. The central objects are called "relative regular holonomic D-modules," which are algebraic structures that encode families of differential equations parametrized by a complex curve S. Think of it as having a smoothly varying collection of differential equation systems, one for each point in S, organized together in a coherent way over a product space X times S.
The core result is a comparison theorem: the authors construct an explicit isomorphism between two different ways of finding solutions to these parametric differential equation systems. One method uses "relative tempered holomorphic functions," which are holomorphic functions allowed to grow at most polynomially near certain boundary regions, tracked in a refined geometric framework called the relative subanalytic site. The other method uses ordinary holomorphic functions on the full product space. The theorem says these two solution procedures give the same answer, confirming that the more subtle tempered approach and the more classical holomorphic approach are equivalent in this relative setting.
This kind of comparison result matters because the two approaches each have different technical advantages. Tempered holomorphic functions connect naturally to the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence, which is a deep bridge between analytic and topological ways of understanding differential equations, while ordinary holomorphic solutions are more directly computable. By showing the two are isomorphic in the relative setting, the paper extends classical results that were known for a single differential equation system to the much more flexible situation where the equations vary in a family, opening the door to applying Riemann-Hilbert style techniques in parametric or deformation contexts.