The paper studies a classical problem in combinatorial geometry: given a collection of points in space, how many times can a specific geometric shape appear among those points? The shape in question is a "regular simplex," which is the higher-dimensional generalization of an equilateral triangle (in 2D) or a regular tetrahedron (in 3D). The question is how many such shapes can be formed by choosing subsets of n points in d-dimensional space, and the goal is to find the maximum possible count as a function of n and the dimension.
Previous work had settled this question cleanly for even-dimensional spaces. This paper tackles the harder case of odd dimensions. The authors prove a precise formula for the maximum number of regular simplices, showing it grows like a specific polynomial in n, but with a correction term that is slightly smaller. Interestingly, in odd dimensions the answer is not as clean as in even dimensions, and the correction term reflects genuine geometric complexity rather than just an artifact of the method. The formula turns out to be a direct generalization of a classical result by Erdos and Pach on how often two points can be exactly a unit distance apart in odd-dimensional spaces.
A particularly striking finding is that the point configurations that nearly achieve the maximum count look structurally different in odd versus even dimensions. In even dimensions there is essentially one way to arrange points to get close to the maximum, but in odd dimensions there are two genuinely different types of near-optimal configurations. The proofs combine tools from hypergraph Turan theory (which studies how densely a combinatorial structure can appear without containing forbidden substructures), linear algebra, and geometric arguments tailored to the odd-dimensional setting.