← Back to arXiv
arXivProbabilityarXiv:2609.28848

Recurrence and transience of random walks on monotonically changing environments

A random walk is a mathematical process where a particle hops between locations according to some random rule. Whether a random walk is "recurrent" (the particle returns to every location infinitely often) or "transient" (it eventually wanders away forever) is a fundamental question. The twist in this paper is that the rules governing the random walk are not fixed: they change over time in a structured way. Specifically, the "conductances" on the network, which control how likely the particle is to travel along each connection, are allowed to increase or decrease monotonically as time progresses.

The main results concern the case where conductances are increasing over time. The authors prove that if the conductances grow toward a limiting configuration that would be recurrent on its own, then the evolving random walk is also recurrent. Similarly, if the starting configuration is already transient, the walk remains transient even as conductances increase. Intuitively, adding more pathways makes it easier for the particle to escape, so a transient start stays transient, and a recurrent limit pulls the walk back repeatedly. These results confirm conjectures made by several research groups, and a special case settles a conjecture about simple random walks on graphs that grow over time, where edges are either present or absent rather than having continuous weights.

Perhaps surprisingly, the analogous statements fail when conductances are decreasing over time. The authors construct explicit counterexamples showing that shrinking conductances toward a transient limit does not guarantee the walk is transient, and starting from a recurrent configuration does not guarantee the walk stays recurrent, even when the conductances never shrink to zero. This asymmetry reveals that increasing and decreasing environments behave in fundamentally different ways, and the intuition from static networks does not transfer cleanly to the decreasing case. Together, the positive results and counterexamples give a complete and somewhat surprising picture of how recurrence and transience respond to monotone changes in the environment.

Read original →