← Back to arXiv
arXivNumber TheoryarXiv:2610.08886

Mean Estimates for Short Polynomial Exponential Sums over Primes

The paper studies a particular kind of oscillating sum built from prime numbers. Take a polynomial with real coefficients, plug each prime number in a short interval into it, and then wrap the result around a circle in the complex plane (this is what the exponential function does here). The resulting sum captures how much cancellation occurs when these complex numbers point in many different directions. The paper then adds up the sizes of these sums as a parameter k varies from 1 to K, producing an average measure of how well-distributed the polynomial values at primes really are.

The main result is a quantitative upper bound on this averaged quantity. The bound depends on how well the leading coefficient of the polynomial can be approximated by a simple fraction with a small denominator, captured through a parameter called Delta. When Delta is small, meaning the coefficient is close to such a fraction, the bound is weaker (less cancellation is guaranteed), which makes intuitive sense because in that regime the exponential sum can be large. The bound comes in two flavors that can be chosen depending on the situation, and it works uniformly no matter where in the number line the interval of primes sits. A key feature is that the result applies to short intervals, not just long ones running up to some large number, which makes it technically harder to achieve.

The proof brings together several tools from analytic number theory. The Fejer kernel, a smoothing device borrowed from Fourier analysis, helps avoid sharp cutoffs that would otherwise create technical problems. A technique called successive differencing is used repeatedly to reduce the complexity of the exponential sum step by step. Estimates involving the average size of the generalized divisor function, which counts the number of ways to factor integers, control the main error terms. Finally, the Brun-Titchmarsh inequality, which gives an upper bound on how many primes fit into a short interval, provides an extra gain that saves an additional logarithmic factor in the final estimate.

Read original →