← Back to arXiv
arXivLogicarXiv:2610.09086

Amenable C-sequences and ineffability in L

The paper addresses a question in set theory about the relationship between two properties that a large cardinal (a very large infinite number with special mathematical features) can have. One property is called "carrying no amenable C-sequence," which roughly means the cardinal lacks a certain kind of combinatorial ladder-like structure that measures it from below. The other property is being "ineffable in L," which refers to a strong indivisibility property holding in a particular minimal mathematical universe called the constructible universe. Inamdar and Rinot conjectured that the first property should imply the second, and this paper shows that conjecture is false.

The authors construct a mathematical scenario where a cardinal can satisfy the first property without satisfying the second. Specifically, they show that a certain type of large cardinal, called a Pi-2-1-indescribable cardinal, can exist in a model of set theory where it carries no amenable C-sequence but fails to be ineffable in the constructible universe. Crucially, the mere existence of such a cardinal is enough to produce this counterexample, meaning the counterexample requires no stronger assumptions than the original large cardinal hypothesis itself. This kind of result, called a relative consistency result, is the standard way of showing that one mathematical statement does not necessarily follow from another.

The technical heart of the argument involves a forcing construction, which is a standard set-theoretic technique for building new mathematical universes with desired properties. The authors use a variant of a method called generalized Hechler forcing to add a club set (a kind of closed unbounded subset) that approximates a given C-sequence at many points. They combine this with an iterative forcing procedure of a specific length, building on earlier work by Johnstone, to carefully arrange that the cardinal loses its amenable C-sequences while its ineffability in L is destroyed. The interplay between these tools forms the core of the paper.

Read original →