Optimal transport is a mathematical framework for finding the most efficient way to move one pile of "mass" (a probability distribution) to another. The central object is a "transport map" that assigns each point in the source distribution to a destination point in the target distribution, minimizing total travel cost. A natural question is: if two target distributions are close to each other, are their corresponding transport maps also close? This paper proves a precise quantitative answer to that question when the source distribution belongs to a special class called log-concave distributions, which includes the Gaussian bell curve and many other common shapes.
The main result says that the difference between two transport maps, measured in a natural averaged sense, is bounded above by a simple expression involving the distance between the two target distributions raised to the power of one-third. The one-third exponent turns out to be the best possible in two or more dimensions, meaning no sharper general bound exists. The proof works by combining two ingredients: a stability estimate for the potential functions that generate the transport maps (using a cleverly chosen weighted norm), and a companion inequality that connects this weighted norm back to the more natural measure of map difference. The weights in these norms are specifically designed to account for the tails of the source distribution, which is a key technical challenge since log-concave distributions can be spread out over all of space.
Beyond the exponent, the paper also tracks how the bound depends on the dimension of the space. The constant in the bound grows like the dimension raised to the two-thirds power, and the authors show the true growth is at least the dimension to the one-third power, leaving some room for improvement in the dimensional scaling. These results matter for applications in statistics, machine learning, and data science, where optimal transport maps are used as tools for comparing and transforming datasets, and where it is important to know that small perturbations in data lead to controlled changes in the resulting maps.